Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search

 

post it button Post -It  Board title
discussion photo

DFID Afternoon Discussion Series: ‘Monitoring Poverty: From Policing to Empowerment’
(Liz Drake) 17 May 2001 - Updated 17 September 2001



UPDATED POST-IT

 Key Lessons from the Series + Seminar Summaries, Full Reports and Presentations: now available

Seminar Series Successfully Concluded on 19 July 2001

Background
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and Impact Assessment (IA) are important for learning about what’s working (or not), how, for whom and why. They are therefore vital tools to improve strategic decision making amongst all stakeholders. They should contribute to strategic policy review and resource allocation processes to ensure that DFID funds are utilised to maximise poverty reduction. To be effective and efficient, systems must deliver the right information to the right people at the right time.

Historically, donor funded M&E and IA efforts have, to a large extent, focused on quantitatively measuring inputs, outputs and activities in ‘policing’ type activities. However, the international development community is increasingly focusing on poverty reduction in terms of qualitative developmental outcomes, as perceived by the poor themselves. The Secretary of State has recognised the need for qualitative information to be collected alongside the quantitative data in order to measure progress towards the IDTs.

As a consequence of these trends, M&E and IA are increasingly viewed by stakeholders at all levels as tools for learning, accountability and empowerment. Although, there are conflicts of interest between different stakeholders on the weight given to each of these objectives. M&E activities can usefully contribute to mutual understanding and accountability between partner governments and poor people.

The seminar series will address the following two questions from both a practical and theoretical perspective:

1. How do we (development practitioners) monitor, evaluate and assess our impacts on poverty at a range of levels?

2. How can the measuring and monitoring of poverty also contribute to learning, accountability and empowerment?

For further information please see the timetable of meetings: Word

Liz Drake (Rural Livelihoods Department DFID)


Seminar Notes:
Key Lessons from the Seminar Series (May-July 2001)
-
Full Report

Seminar 1: Introduction and Overview of Formal and Innovative Methods of Monitoring and Evaluation (17 May 2001)
Key Question: 'Can M&E Systems Adapt and Survive in a Diverse and Unpredictable World?'
- Summary
- Full report
- Henry Lucas (IDS)
Presentation
- Rick Davies (CDS) Presentation

Seminar 2: How do we monitor and evaluate the IDTs? (24 May 2001)
- Summary
- Full report

Seminar 3: Monitoring and evaluating new approaches to development assistance (7 June 2001)
- Summary
- Full Report
- David Booth (ODI) Presentation
- Rosmary McGee (IDS) Presentation
- Andrew Lawson (OPM) Presentation

Seminar 4: When does M&E translate into empowerment - for whom and how? (21 June 2001)
- Summary
- Full Report

Seminar 5: Public Accountability: who needs to know what, why and how? and Making New Technologies Work for Development (5 July 2001)
- Summary
- Full Report
- Sakiko Fakuda Parr (UNDP) Presentation NB Size 15Mb

Seminar 6: Qualitative and quantitative approaches: a false dichotomy? (13 July 2001)
- Summary
- Full Report
- Sam McPherson (PLAN) Presentation
Seminar 7: Learning lessons from poverty monitoring experiences in North and South (19 July 2001)
- Summary
- Full Report



Seminar Notes
Related Postings
Contribute

Related Postings :
Indicators of Sustainable Livelihoods (Donal Brown)
27 June 2000
Sustainability Indicators for Farming-based Livelihood Systems (David Howlett) 24 July 2000
Non-Indicator Approaches to Monitoring Changes in Livelihoods (Rick Davies) 3 Aug 2000
Monitoring and Evaluating Impact on Livelihoods (Liz Drake)
26 Oct 2000
Assessing the Impact of NRM Research (Bruce Campbell)
16 Nov 2000
Case Studies on Livelihoods Monitoring (Liz Drake)
15 March 2001
Measurement Malaise - Is the SL Approach Inoperable? (Duncan MacQueen) 22 June 2001
Why not comment?




 Contribute:

Send your insights, experiences and views to the Post-it Board by email to: livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk

Please mention your name, tel, fax, and institutional affiliation in your contribution and give it a short title. If you wish to comment on an existing item or theme please also mention its title in your contribution. If you think there should be a new theme, tell us.



 
 

" "DFID logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Panos Picture
  IDS Logo" "
" "
" "
Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search