Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search

 

post it button Post -It  Board title

discussion photo

Can we attribute weighting to different capitals?

(Elaine Marshall: DFID / FRP)
11 November 2003


"Commercialisation of Non timber forest products (NTFP) in Mexico and Bolivia: factors influencing success" is a DFID funded research project which aims to evaluate the contribution that NTFPs make to the livelihoods of forest dependent rural poor. We have undertaken research with local NGO partners in 18 communities in Mexico and Bolivia, and have generated data at household & community level, and along the value chain for 10 different NTFPs.

We are pulling together our findings around our 6 research hypotheses, and also via the development of a Bayesian Belief Network, which is a model structured around the relationships between different factors which influence sets of outcomes. It works rather like a decision tree. Whilst one network has been structured around livelihood impacts of NTFP commercialisation (using CIFOR Global Study indicators), the other network is structured around the five capitals, for each stage along the commercialisation chain (production/collection, processing, storage, transport, marketing, sale). We are training the network with our data as to how important different variables appear to be from our case study data. Ultimately, we hope that the network will be able to illustrate (via an interactive model) the relative importance of different factors on overall success.

This brings me to my question. I understand that natural capital
represents a battery pack, if you like, for many rural livelihoods
systems, and conversion of natural capital into financial capital is necessary in order for rural communities to engage with local, regional, national economies. However, without good physical capital, for example, it may mean that the potential of natural capital is not realised. This highlights the importance of the availability of all five capitals and their respective interactions.

However, for the model to function to its full ability, we need to give "weighting" to the five capitals. This could be done by supplying equal weighting to all of them. What we would like to ask is if anyone would like to share any thinking on how you think we may best going about attributing "weighting" to the different capitals. Do all five have the same potential to influence success? Or is any one of them always going to be of overriding importance?

Any thoughts would be of enormous value.
Kind Regards

Elaine Marshall

Elaine Marshall - Senior Forest Programme Officer
DFID / FRP funded research project co-ordinator
UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Programme
219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge
CB3 0DL, U.K
Tel: +44 1223 277314
Fax: +44 1223 277136
Email: Elaine.Marshall@unep-wcmc.org

Web site: http://www.unep-wcmc.org/forest/NTFP




Related Postings
Contribute

Related Postings :
Measurement Malaise - Is the SL Approach Inoperable?
(Duncan MacQueen: NRIL) 22 June 2001
Increasing Rural Mobility (Annabel Davis, Project Manager, TRL Limited) 24 October 2001
Why not comment?




 Contribute:

Send your insights, experiences and views to the Post-it Board by email to: livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk

Please mention your name, tel, fax, and institutional affiliation in your contribution and give it a short title. If you wish to comment on an existing item or theme please also mention its title in your contribution. If you think there should be a new theme, tell us.



 
 

" "DFID logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Panos Picture
  IDS Logo" "
" "
" "
Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search