 | In Brief: |
Risk
management appraisals within a Sustainable Livelihoods framework
is sought to gain an idea of how risk assessment has been incorporated
into project design and monitoring.
No
real tool has been identified to measure accurately or to produce
an actual livelihoods analysis. Livelihood analysis is often considered
to have been achieved if various standard PRA tools are combined
and then added to household interviews.
Identifying
the right questions is key to getting livelihoods discussion going with a community
and to gaining insights into the real issues people are grappling with.
Barry Pound provides an example of the evaluation of an existing project in Moldova
which employs an SL approach, with a view to expansion and consolidation of the
project experience in this area. Research
in a Zarma community in SW Niger, West Africa has sought to find ways of applying
the SL framework in a dryland community where the 'capital' framework has been
problematic in measuring the different kinds of 'capitals'. Srinivas Chokkakula desribes the similarities between the SL framework
and that of
the Kachchh Ecology Fund. It provides an experience of using the SL framework
in practice and identifies lessons learnt. Cecile
Brugere announces a paper that discusses, through the presentation of a case study
on Southern India, the advantages and disadvantages of using a livelihoods approach
to determine target communities and resource-poor groups for potential poverty-focused
aquaculture interventions. |