Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search



market photo

Linking macro level policies and processes to local realities is more important than ever. As many agencies and governments move towards more macro instruments such as country-level development strategies and budget support, it is critical to ensure that these policies are informed with a good understanding of the reality of poor people's livelihoods.

Sustainable livelihoods approaches have been applied at the macro level in a number of different contexts. Many practitioners and policy makers argue that the ability of sustainable livelihoods approaches to provide a multidimensional understanding of poverty and to 'fit in' with other development approaches is key. Others see the value of SLA as an alternative approach - a 'reality check'. Many have used SLAs as a way to facilitate change within institutions and organisations.

These papers aim to explore these issues and bring together many of the key papers which use SLAs at the macro level. It is not intended to be a review but working pages which collate the main documents, highlight lessons and guide further reading and contacts.

There are two key sections:

Country-level development strategies and sustainable livelihoods

Sustainable livelihoods and institutional change

If you have documents you would like to add to this section, please send them to livelihoodsconnect@ids.ac.uk


 
Country-level development strategies and sustainable livelihoods
  Country level development strategies are national strategies aimed at reducing poverty within a coherent framework. They enhance development effectiveness in the long term by emphasising national ownership, prioritising poverty reduction and sustainable development , and addressing macro-economic concerns and structural and social issues.

SL approaches can enhance both the process and content of country level development strategies . Such strategies must be tailored to meet the unique development challenges of a country and be concerned with local realities and needs. Sustainable livelihood approaches (SLAs) can provide conceptual tools to understand the policies and institutions which affect people's livelihoods . They can also gain insight into factors contributing to poverty by identifying groups of poor people and analysing livelihoods. They can aid the process by helping in the design of effective participatory consultation processes and encouraging multi-sectoral working.

The papers in this section provide:
an overview of SLAs within country level development strategies

country specific examples of the application of SLAs in country level development strategies


Papers with an overview of SLAs within country level development strategies
Assessment of Micro-Macro Linkages in Poverty Alleviation: South Asia (UNDP/2003) PDF
This report focuses on UNDP experience and assesses the linkages between micro level participatory poverty alleviation schemes and macro level poverty alleviation policy initiatives in five countries in South Asia - Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Broad recommendations suggest the importance of continuing to advocate for more holistic and dynamic approaches; disseminating lessons to macro levels processes through analysis of micro level projects and the critical nature of poverty monitoring.
NEW
Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets, Section 6 -Comparing Development Approaches  PDF
This section of the guidance sheets examines the relationship between SL approaches and country-level development strategies such as the Comprehensive Development Framework, Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers and National Strategies for Sustainable Development. It provides a useful introduction to macro level policy and livelihoods by unraveling some of the main terminology and concepts.
Sub-Saharan Africa's Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers from Social Policy and Sustainable Livelihoods Perspectives (Neil Thin; Mary Underwood / Jim Gilling / 2001) HTML
How far are social policy and livelihood issues/approaches incorporated in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs)? Can SL approaches strengthen and add value to national level policy on poverty reduction? This report written in 2001 presents findings from a review of documents to offer insights into PRSPs. It is based on published PRSPs from Africa as well as joint staff assessments of the World Bank and IMF. The review is descriptive and analytical and its recommendations are deliberately challenging, suggesting priorities for strengthening social policy and livelihood dimensions in PRSPs.
The Potential of Using Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (Andy Norton / Mick Foster / 2001) HTML
Do sustainable livelihoods (SL) approaches have value at the level of overall poverty reduction policy? To what extent can they be used in support of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs)? This 2001 ODI working paper reviews the operational experience of working with SL approaches at policy levels, and explores their possible application in the PRSPs in terms both of process (how the PRSP is developed and research conducted) and specific content. It highlights advantages and drawbacks of the approach and recommends areas where further work needs to be carried out.
Developing Pro-Poor Policy - Are PRSPs the Answer? (Theme 3 of DFID / Asia Regional Livelihoods Workshop / 2000) PDF
This is an extract from a report of an Asia Regional livelihoods workshop held in 2000. Given the limited Asian experience of the PRSP initiative, presentations and discussions under this theme focused broadly on national planning processes and on the challenges of scaling up livelihood issues to national levels, rather than narrowly on PRSPs. Neil Thin presented a background paper , comparing the experiences in Africa and Asia. A table highlights the livelihoods contents of Asian PRSPs. Elizabeth Carriere's paper focused upon the links between livelihoods analysis and macro-policy formation in Indonesia. Small group discussion highlighted observations regarding the links between SL and national poverty analysis.

Guidelines for Understanding a Regional-National Sustainable Livelihoods Study ( Khanya / 2000) PDF
These guidelines are intended to assist people who wish to develop a poverty eradication strategy using a sustainable livelihoods (SL) approach. This could be for a region, or country, but it is assumed these would be based on the SL principles. It is based on work carried out in Zambia, Zimbabwe and South Africa during 1998/9, which explored how the approach could be undertaken, with different partners and emphases.

Papers providing country specific examples of the use of SLAs within country-led development strategies
Jordan Human Development Report 2004: Building Sustainable Livelihoods
English PDF (2MB) / Arabic PDF (3 MB) NEW
Jordan's second National Human Development Report places the poor at the centre of analysis and attempts to understand poverty through the eyes of the poor themselves. The report promotes sustainable livelihoods as the goal
of development and uses the SL framework to capture and analyse the strategies of the poor as they struggle to escape poverty. The report places great emphasis on issues of vulnerability and the impact of shock. A major theme is that the considerable human development gains that have been achieved at the macro-level in Jordan have yet to trickle down to many sub-groups among the poor.
Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction Strategies in Four African Countries (Frank Ellis / H. Ade Freeman) PDF
This paper compares and contrasts rural livelihoods in Uganda, Kenya,Tanzania and Malawi, with a view to informing rural poverty reduction policies within Poverty Reduction Strategy Plans (PRSPs). Lessons for PRSPs centre on the creation of a facilitating rather than blocking public sector environment for the multiplication of non-farm enterprises; seeking creative solutions to the spread of technical advice to farmers; and examining critically the necessity for, and impact of, tax revenue collection by district councils on rural incomes and enterprise. This is a useful paper for using SLAs to understand the local context to inform PRSP processes.
The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Programme Development in Cambodia (Cathryn Turton / 2000) PDF
SL approaches influenced the development of DFID's Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Cambodia. Cathryn Turton discusses how SL approaches were used to identify options for a programme to support rural livelihoods in Cambodia and how this work was subsequently fed into wider discussions on the CSP. The experiences discussed would be a useful reference for activities seeking to make CSPs or other national strategies more people centred, more holistic and better informed by the links between poverty at the micro-level and macro-level policy.
Mongolia: Participatory Living Standards Assessment 2000 (Robin Mearns / Enkhtor Dulamdary / Meera Kaul Shah / 2001) PDF
How can participatory learning and action methods broaden and deepen understanding of poverty at the national level in Mongolia? Can sustainable livelihood (SL) approaches strengthen and add value to national level policy on poverty reduction? The Participatory Living Standards Assessment 2000 (PLSA) aims to inform national policy, in part as an essential component of Mongolia's PRSP. The paper reflects on issues such as social differentiation, vulnerability and access to assets that will need to be tackled at public policy level in order to help create an enabling environment within which all groups in Mongolia may achieve more secure and sustainable livelihoods.
Learning from the Grassroots: Lessons from Community Action for Policy Change (George Varughese / SEI ) (PDF)
This paper investigates how the decentralisation process in India is enabling more grassroots organisations to be recognised and how they are making an increasing contribution to policy formulation and implementation at different levels.

People, Poverty and Livelihoods: Links for Sustainable Poverty Reduction in Indonesia (Nilanjana Mukherjee / Joan Hardjono / Elizabeth Carriere / 2002) PDF
What does the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach add to participatory research on poverty? What are the links between macro-level structures, poor people's resources and livelihood strategies? This paper reports on participatory action research carried out in four communities in Indonesia in 2000. The research aimed to inform the World Bank's poverty assessment and Country Assistance Strategy and to demonstrate the potential of the Sustainable Livelihoods framework to increase understanding of the dynamics of poverty. Highlights of the study findings include that SL offered an analysis which captures the complexity of poverty issues, can respond flexibly to poor people's priorities, and remains directly relevant to policy and intervention strategies.
Poverty Eradication Strategy for the Free State -South Africa (Government of South Africa and Khanya/ 1999) PDF
This report is a strategy document for the reduction of poverty in the Free State, South Africa. It is a useful example for those embarking on a poverty reduction strategy process, working with a network of stakeholders and wishing to use the sustainable livelihoods approach to think through issues. It uses SLA to facilitate a multidimensional understanding of poverty and as a conceptual tool for carrying out research for the strategy.
The Role of the State in Rural Poverty Reduction: Where do Sector-Wide and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches Fit in? (Jim Gilling / Alex Duncan / Stephen Jones / 2000) DOC
What are the links between sector-wide approaches (SWAPS) and sustainable livelihood approaches (SLAs) in the context of poverty reduction? Can SLAs identify the potential role of governments and donors in fighting poverty? A recent report from Oxford Policy Management discusses the use of SWAPS and SLAs to enhance the pro-poor impact of development assistance. The paper presents a framework that encompasses both approaches and focuses on the role of the state in poverty-focused policy formulation and implementation. The paper concludes with a set of guidelines that indicate the core areas upon which donors need to focus if they are to exploit potential synergy between SWAPS and SLAs.

 

Introduction
Country Level
Livelihoods&
Institutional Change
Papers with overview
Papers with specific examples
Feedback




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

 Feedback:

Feedback on the PIP area and any queries regarding PIP materials are welcome by email to: livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk



   

" "Livelihoods Network Logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Copyright Panos Pictures
  IDS logo" "
" "
www.livelihoods.org" "
Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search