| Welcome
to the Policies, Institutions and Processes (PIPs)
area.
This area gives an introduction to the concepts behind Policies,
Institutions and Processes (PIPs) and the background to
a selection of PIP papers.
|
 |
Introduction
to the PIP Papers: Frank Ellis (UEA)
|
The policy,
institutions and processes (PIP) dimension of the Sustainable
Livelihoods (SL) framework comprises the social and institutional
context within which rural individuals and families construct and
adapt their livelihoods. As such it embraces quite a complex range
of issues associated with participation, power, authority, governance,
laws, policies, public service delivery, social relations (gender,
caste, ethnicity), institutions (laws, markets, land tenure arrangements)
and organisations (NGOs, government agencies, private sector).
In
the SL framework, policy, institutions and processes differ from
the vulnerability context in that the latter principally comprises
exogenous trends and events (shocks, seasonality, economic trends);
while the former comprise social and political aspects which are
typically endogenous to the norms and rules of the wider society.
Of course this distinction is not watertight, but it is nevertheless
useful to make the broad distinction between effects on livelihoods
over which people have little or no control (the vulnerability context)
from those which are a result of history, politics, decision-making,
negotiation, in which local communities can actually or potentially
engage and participate.
PIP
is important
because it determines the degree to which an enabling or facilitating
environment for livelihoods is in place, compared to an inhibiting
and blocking one. The "processes" part of this dimension
refers explicitly to processes of change in policies and institutions,
and a considerable amount of contemporary development policy is
about such change i.e. intended to lead to motivation, responsiveness,
accountability, transparency, participation, even-handedness and
so on in the performance of agencies that have the capacity to influence
for the better livelihood prospects and choices.
In
an earlier incarnation, this dimension of the SL framework was called
"transforming structures and processes". This emphasised,
in addition to the desirability of institutional and organisation
change, the need for development agencies to transform the institutional
context of livelihoods. Such a transformation would result in an
entirely different approach to the problems and opportunities of
the poor compared to what has tended to be the practice in the past,
especially on the part of local level government agencies. It would
involve such agencies proactively seeking, in consultation with
the poor themselves, to widen the opportunities for income generation
open to them, reduce administrative barriers, and stimulate activity
and enterprise.
The
PIP Sub-Group was commissioned to produce material on different
aspects of policies and institutions, suitable for a web-based learning
environment (webtopics). Many of the papers in this list provide
links to other online sources of information in the topic areas
that they cover. The draft papers currently available to review
are presented as either interactive documents (Web format) or as
wordprocessed papers (Word format). The Word formats may help for
saving/printing off-line but do not necessarily contain all the
linked background papers referred to in the Web versions.
 |
PIP Materials |
 |
|
PIP
Papers : |
 |
Hill
Agricultural Research Project (HARP) Nepal - Lessons for the
Policy, Institutions and Processes Dimensions of the Sustainable
Livelihoods Approach: Web
/ Word |
 |
Decentralisation Web /
Word |
 |
Research,
Extension and Farmer Organisations Web /
Word |
 |
Governance
Word |
 |
Organisational
Change Word |
 |
Linking
Micro to Macro by Empowering the Rural Poor Word
|
 |
Livestock
Service Delivery - Best Practice Word
|
 |
New
Institutional Economics Web / Word
|
Two
examples of background papers to the PIP Sub-Group's work (produced
for FAO) are given below:
 |
|
Background
Papers : |
 |
Sustainable
Livelihoods Approaches at the Policy Level Word
|
 |
Institutions
and Sustainable Livelihoods Word |
Some
papers contain elements in pdf format which need to be viewed using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader. If your web-browser does not automatically
open these files the necessary software is available free to download
onto your computer from Adobe's
site.
 |
Links |
Policy
Research Programme (DFID)
This DFID Policy Research Programme identifies
that for the livelihoods of poor people to improve, linkages
between micro level (community) and meso level (local government
and district service providers) also need to improve.
|
 |
PIP Post-its |
For
more insights and experiences on PIPs, or to contribute your
own views on this theme, visit the PIPs
post-it area.
|
|