| Farmers' Organisations and Agricultural Technology:
Institutions that Give Farmers a Voice |
 |
Box 3: The Dynamics of Collaboration Between Research and
Farmers' Organisations
|
Key: # no research/FO
linkages; FO/research linkages
| Burkina
Faso
|
Three case
studies
Two
cases in which the dynamics of linkages strongly enhance research with,
however, a fundamental difference between the two situations: in one case,
Diébougou (Burkina Faso), producers are organised in groups,
co-ordination being carried out by a third organisation (the Diocese of
Diébougou); in the second case, researchers have a formal, structured
farmers organisation as a partner: the FUGN: Fédération des
Groupements Naam (FUGN).
The
third case shows the dynamics of a group forming part of a structured
organisation, the FUGN, to which research responds positively when technical
constraints are identified.
|
| Guinea
|
Two case
studies
A
situation presenting strong, structured farmers' organisation dynamics on at a
regional level, structured around several levels of farmers groups
(Fédération des Paysans in Fouta Djallon).
A
situation where linkages with research are strongly shaped by the institutional
environment, with a farmers' organisation structured around one sector,
grappling with technical recommendations not well adapted to farmers
livelihood needs (Fédération Nationale des Planteurs de
Café de Guinée FNPCG).
|
| Cameroon
|
Three case
studies
/#
Situations where technical requests from producers are made by organisations
whose core motivation is to solve common marketing problems. Agricultural
research institutions are situated in a difficult institutional and financial
context, hard-pushed to rise above simple individual initiatives of
researchers. These can be described as informal, ad hoc linkages.
|
| Ghana
|
Six case
studies
# Five cases
correspond to conventional research processes connected with extension
services; the producer groups involved can be described either as contact
groups, or as non-collective linkages (individuals and families
);
research is working with producers individually as a function of its own
research questions and research protocols that arise from these.
Another
case concerns an initiative of the privatised Ghana Cotton Company, which
piloted the formation of producer groups to take charge of certain economic
functions before and after cotton production. The regional agricultural
research institute (SARI) and extension service are not involved with this
group, but research and extension support is provided by the Company.
|
| The
Gambia
|
Two case
studies
# A situation
where research has collaborated in a conventional way with extension and
mobilises a very small number of "contact" farmers to test
agricultural technologies thought to solve farmer-identified
problems/constraints; no organisational dynamics exist beyond these actions
(State-inspired Village Development Committees exist, but are not yet strong
partners for agricultural service providers).
# Collaboration
between a farmers organisation (ad hoc village development group)
in the process of formation and an international NGO ActionaAid The
Gambia.
# Another case
is presented showing an emerging national farmers organisation based
around sesame production, without, as yet, any direct linkage with national
agricultural research and extension.
|
|