| Sustainable Livelihoods and New Institutional
Economics |
 |
The Central Role of Institutions
1.1 Institutions: Keys to Development? |
A good starting
point for understanding how institutions and transaction activities can affect
development within a community is provided by the work of
Douglass North. North argues that wealth is created
through trade (including all forms of exchange) since this allows different
individuals, groups or regions to specialise in production activities according
to comparative advantages in access to and use of assets. Trade, however,
requires co-operation between the trading parties, and the transaction
activities associated with this are costly. Aside from the physical costs of
transport, buyers and sellers have to communicate to establish contact and then
to bargain, agree and execute a transaction, with mechanisms to check and
enforce the delivery and quality of goods, services and payments.
The costs
involved in communicating and enforcing transactions and the property
rights on which they are based are known as transaction costs and
these are incurred in order to reduce the risks of loss from transaction
failure. If transaction costs and/or the risks of loss from transaction failure
are too high, greater than the margin of revenues over physical transformation
costs, then they will cancel out the cost savings and other benefits possible
from trade. The result is market failure and trade will not then occur, with
consequent loss of its wider benefits to society as a whole. Critical to our
understanding of economic development, therefore, is an understanding of
transaction costs and risks of transaction losses.
Davis and North (1971) identify two major
influences on transaction costs and on the risks of transaction failure: the
institutional environment, and institutional arrangements.
Institutional arrangements are the particular forms of
contract or arrangement that people and organisations are set up for particular
transactions (share cropping and commission sales are examples for land and
commodity transactions respectively).
The institutional environment (sometimes known as the institutional
framework) is the broader set of institutions (or rules of the
game) within which people and organisations develop and implement
specific institutional arrangements.
Formal
institutions (such as by-laws, national laws, policies, the national
constitution, and international laws and treaties) are clearly part of the
institutional environment and distinct from institutional arrangements. The
distinction may not always be so clear, however, for informal institutions
(such as social customs and conventions) widespread acceptance of particular
institutional arrangements as the norm can mean that in effect they become part
of the institutional environment.
North
argues that in a close traditional village community, transaction costs between
villagers are low: people know about each others activities and
reliability while social relations and structures both encourage people to keep
agreements and also provide mechanisms for enforcing agreements and resolving
disputes. For development to proceed, however, people need to trade between
communities and with the wider national and international economies. This
requires institutional environments and institutional arrangements that are
effective in reducing the transaction costs and risks of increasingly complex
and distant forms of trade and property rights.
North
argues that the development of the institutional environment is central to
economic development, through its effects on transaction costs and risks, and
hence on trade. Productive economic activity, with specialisation and complex
forms of exchange, is thus stimulated in countries with a highly developed
institutional environment. Countries with an under-developed institutional
environment, on the other hand, have transaction costs and risks that are too
high for actors to engage in complex forms of exchange, and they therefore
remain relatively undifferentiated and cannot realise gains to be made from
specialisation and economies of scale. North concludes that "the inability
of societies to develop effective, low-cost enforcement of contracts is the
most important source of both historical stagnation and contemporary
underdevelopment in the Third World."
Our
summary of NIE analysis provides three entry points to reduce transaction costs
and risks: development of the institutional environment, development of more
effective institutional arrangements within the existing institutional
environment, and development of infrastructure and services to improve
communication and reduce its costs. These are very relevant to sustainable
livelihoods analysis, and to household, meso, macro and international scales of
analysis. (See Box 1)
We
conclude this section by noting that fundamentally NIE involves a recognition
that holistic analysis of economic activity requires explicit reference to
institutions. It is also recognised, however, that institutions exist for a
wide variety of reasons, and in analysing them and their development, their
varied and often multiple roles will not be understood by economic analysis
alone.
BOX 1 - Reducing the transaction costs
associated with input provision by the private sector
Consider the participation of the commercial private sector in the provision of
services. North's ideas focus attention on the transaction costs and risks
faced by firms in providing services and by entrepreneurs in using those
services in productive activities. These may be reduced by improvements in:
- The institutional environment: e.g. ensuring
secure property rights to promote private sector investment in transport and
storage facilities, improved market information, regulation of weights and
measures, clear product quality standards, stable macro-economic policies (to
control inflation and preserve the value of investments)
- Institutional arrangements: e.g. promoting
enterprise groups, facilitating provider/user links
- Infrastructure: providing roads to reduce
transport costs for products and for people, investing in telephone systems to
facilitate the transfer of information
|
|