| Hill Agricultural Research Project (HARP) Nepal - Lessons for
the Policy, Institutions and Processes Dimensions of the Sustainable
Livelihoods Approach: Karim Hussein (ODI) and Sarah Montagu
(DFID) |
 |
2. Livelihoods Context and Summary Data: Nepal |
Background
Agricultural services in Nepal are faced with a complex context
that conditions and shapes the effectiveness of their work and the
options that can be taken in trying to promote agricultural development.
Some aspects of the context are summarised below.
People and Population
According to current estimates, about 22 million people
live in Nepal in 75 districts. The highest concentration of people
live in the Kathmandu Valley and over 90% of the population is rural.
Nepal is a very heterogeneous society with a complex ethnic mix.
This heterogeneity is overlaid by great disparities in social and
economic opportunities. The poor and very poor are located predominantly
in the mountains and very remote areas, in the mid and far west
districts and also dispersed throughout rural areas. Causes of poverty
are diverse.
Poverty and Vulnerability
According to the 1996 Nepal Living Standards Survey, 42% of Nepal's
population lives under the poverty line - and the poorest live in
the remotest areas. Rural populations are vulnerable to natural
calamities such as floods, landslides, soil erosion and the particularly
harsh environment of the mountain regions; in addition the escalating
civil conflict due to Maoist insurgency is disrupting livelihoods
in poorer, remoter rural districts.
Human Capital
Human capital is weak, indicated by: average national illiteracy
rate of 64% (twice as high in rural as in urban areas); high infant,
child and maternal mortality and malnutrition: nearly 50% of young
children are underweight and have stunted growth.
Natural Capital
Access to adequate natural capital - land, water and common property
resources - is constrained:
- less than
20% of rural households are landless, but land fragmentation,
dual ownership and size (2/3 of landholdings are less than 1ha)
hinder productivity;
- water is
abundant, but access to drinking and irrigation water is unequal,
only
44% of the population has access to safe, clean water and the
physical infrastructure that exists has been poorly managed;
- forest resources
are critical, supplying 90% of total fuel, 50% of livestock fodder
and potentially highly valuable non-timber forest products (e.g.
medicinal herbs);
- about 45
out 75 districts in the country are in food deficit and of these,
about 13 mountain and hill districts have less than 6 months'
food sufficiency most years.
Physical
Access
This remains a serious constraint to the 14 districts without roads
and in the context of a challenging mountainous environment where
many settlements may only be accessible by several days' walk. Lack
of roads also poses significant problems for farmers to access markets
for the purchase of essentials and sale of produce. Few have access
to sanitation or electricity.
Financial Capital
Access to financial capital through formal channels is restricted
to 15% of borrowers, owing to limitations in the capacity of institutions
to deliver services to the rural poor and the wider policy environment.
However, pensions and remittances are important sources of financial
capital.
Political Leadership and Instability
The continuing lack / instability of political leadership and weak
commitment to change creates a difficult policy environment.
Patronage
Political patronage, afno manche (one's own people) and associated
inequities in gender, caste, ethnicity and age limit access to resources
and opportunities. Social capital, networks and trust as well as
user groups are essential to people's livelihood strategies.
|