LessonsInformation ResourcesEmail UpdateEnquiry DeskPost-it BoardPIPsHomeSearch


 
Lessons

reading photo
Management of Aquatic Ecosystems through Community Husbandry (MACH)

Bangladesh
Partners    
Start date
1998
End date
2007
Commitment (£)
£4.7m USAid
£2.6m Bangladesh Government
 
* Winrock International, Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS)
* Centre for Natural Resources Studies (CNRS), CARITAS Bangladesh
Collaborators
*

Government of Bangladesh
supported by
USAID

Contacts
* Esha Husain: eshahusain@winrockbd.org, Atiqur Rahman: arahman@winrockbd.org

Purpose

The major purpose of MACH is to demonstrate to communities, local government and policy-makers the viability of community and integrated approaches to resource management and habitat conservation over a number of representative wetlands.
The MACH ‘community’ includes all of those people dependent either economically or nutritionally on the floodplain and its products. The programme emphasizes and works with poorer groups, particularly fisher communities, but includes local government as well as the local elites to ensure sustainability.


Lessons:
Technical Paper 1
Restoring Wetlands Through Improved Governance: Community Based Co-management in Bangladesh
PDF
Technical Paper 2
Lessons from Community Based Co-management of Large Wetlands in Bangladesh
PDF
Technical Paper 3
Industrial Pollution and its Threat to Mokesh Beel Wetland in Kaliakoir
PDF
Technical Paper 4
Wetland Protection and Enhancement Through Sanctuaries in Bangladesh
PDF
Technical Paper 6
Economic Value of Bangladesh Wetlands
PDF
Technical Paper 7
Extent and Duration of Inundation and its Relation with Fish Production in Hail Haor
PDF
Technical Paper 8
Trends in Fish Consumption in Community Restored Wetlands
PDF
MACH Success Stories PDF 1MB
MACH II Completion Report Volume 1 PDF 1MB
MACH II Completion Report Volume 2 PDF 1MB


Purpose
 Lessons
Use of SL Approaches
Other Community Development Projects
Contribute



Use of Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches

Inland capture fisheries historically make an important contribution to the livelihoods of the rural poor of Bangladesh. About 13 million people are estimated to depend for their livelihoods on the fishery sector, but half of all rural households living in floodplains catch fish for food or income, and about 80% of households fishing for an income are poor.

Increased landlessness and poverty due to rapid population growth have increased fishing pressure contributing to depletion of fish stocks, which in turn has adversely impacted on the livelihoods of those dependent on inland capture fisheries. The MACH project has worked to reverse this through interventions such as wetland restoration and livelihood diversification.

MACH adopted the Community based Co-management approach to address poverty, declining fisheries and environmental degradation of wetlands in Bangladesh. Major elements of its work include:
• Mobilizing communities into registered organisations ‘Resource User Groups‘ that are empowered to conserve the resource;
• Helping them make resource management maps and plans;
• Undertaking habitat restoration;
• Adopting conservation measures for sustainable harvesting;
• Introducing alternative sources of income to reduce pressure on wetlands and enhance incomes (such as cow rearing, poultry and aquaculture, and also training in occupational skills to be mechanics and electricians).
• Engaging local government bodies and elected members to strengthen and provide sustainable support to these local Resource Management Organizations (RMOs).

Some of the key lessons from the livelihood diversification support work have been:

• Learn from field experience: the creation of self-employment opportunities and small entrepreneurship schemes has been financially feasible and has enabled the poor to adopt wetland conservation and sustainable use practices
• Make the poor fishers count in protection and conservation of wetland resources by diversifying their livelihoods so that they can reduce their dependence on wetlands
• Women have an important role: they can influence opinion in support of wetland conservation and protection when they have the incentive of AIGAs
• Strengthen local institutions for sustainability: do not just create new organizations, link these with existing institutions (public and private) that can take credit for improvements in livelihoods and resource management
• Make the fruits of development both quantitative and qualitative: economic benefits are essential for the poor, but so too are establishing human rights and good governance, freedom of choice, and good neighborly living. A participatory process, such as that adopted by MACH, gives the poor the opportunity and choice to take initiatives they need.




Contribute:

Livelihoods Connect welcomes details of how sustainable livelihoods approaches are being used by your project. Simply complete the Sustainable Livelihoods Project Summary Form and send it as an email attachment to:

livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk.


    

" "Livelihoods Network Logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Copyright Panos Pictures
  IDS logo" "
" "
www.livelihoods.org" "
LessonsInformation ResourcesEmail UpdateEnquiry DeskPost-it BoardPIPsHomeSearch