'Goodbye to Projects?' was a research project exploring the
institutional implications of adopting a sustainable livelihoods
approach to the planning, implementation and assessment of
development interventions.
The
aim was to broaden our understanding of whether (and if so,
why) adopting a sustainable livelihoods approach makes development
interventions more effective in reducing poverty.
It
also considered the place for sustainable livelihoods approaches
in varying types of development interventions (projects, programmes
and sector-wide approaches).
Lessons:
Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches
- Can they transform development? December
2002. PDFNEW
Final
Report-Goodbye to Projects? The Institutional Impact of
Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches on Development Interventions
March 2004 PDF
Briefing
papers
An
overview: Projects and Principles
March 2004 PDF
The
application of the SL principles March
2004 PDF
The
changing format of development interventions
March 2004 PDF
Lessons
for Community-Based Planning Interventions
March 2004 PDF
Lessons from Rural Livelihoods Interventions
March 2004 PDF
Approaches
to projects and development have undergone considerable change
in the last decade with significant policy shifts on governance,
gender, poverty eradication, and environmental issues. Most
recently this has led to the adoption and promotion of the
sustainable livelihood (SL) approach. The adoption of the
SL approach presents challenges to development interventions
including: the future of projects and programmes, and sector
wide approaches (SWAPs) and direct budgetary support.
This project undertook an innovative review of these issues.
Central to this was to question how a livelihood approach
is actually being used in a range of development interventions.
This was used to identify and clarify the challenges to the
design, appraisal and implementation of development interventions
and changes required from the adoption of a livelihoods approach.
The research was conducted in two phases. The first phase
consisted of general and country reviews on SL and development
interventions. The second phase of the research was detailed
case studies on development interventions in Uganda, Tanzania
and South Africa. These case studies compared and contrasted
the implementation of sector wide approaches, programmes and
projects developed following an SL approach against those
designed using a “classical” approach.
Contribute:
Livelihoods Connect welcomes details of how sustainable livelihoods approaches
are being used by your project. Simply complete the Sustainable
Livelihoods Project Summary Form and send it as an email attachment
to: