Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search


Lessons

reading photo
Case Studies

A Sustainable Livelihoods Approach to Drought and Water Security (Ethiopia)

1. Introduction
Adopting a sustainable livelihoods perspective on drought and water security results in a fundamental shift in focus away from the resource itself to people, the role of water in their livelihood strategies, and resource conditions. The ramifications of this shift are considerable: projects tackling drought mitigation and water security become problem-led rather than 'discipline-led'; non-physical barriers to water access rise in prominence; access to water is seen in the context of people's livelihood security, and so on. The experience of the British Geological Survey (BGS), which has been gradually adopting a livelihoods perspective in its projects since the mid-1990s, suggests that such a shift in perspective is likely to have far reaching implications for the way in which projects on drought and water security are planned and implemented.

Which of the core concepts of the SLA does this project best illustrate?

Core Concept  
People centred
Holistic
Dynamic  
Building on strengths  
Macro-micro links  
Sustainability  

In 1994, BGS began work on a DFID Knowledge and Research (KAR) project on 'Groundwater management in drought prone areas of Africa'. The impetus for this project was the 1991-92 drought that affected much of Southern Africa, and which left many rural communities without ready access to water. This initial project was resource-focused, highlighting groundwater management policies and interventions that might increase access to water during drought and, by implication, protect rural livelihoods. A second KAR project, 'Groundwater drought early warning for vulnerable areas' followed in 1997. Working with partners in Ethiopia, the project aims to develop guidelines for identifying areas where groundwater is less reliable and, within these areas, for identifying the most water-insecure communities. This project, which ended in October 2000, followed a more livelihoods-based approach in terms of problem definition, methodology and recommendations, although both projects have reflected concern that drought policy has been too narrowly focused on humanitarian food relief.

 Next Page


Introduction
SL Approach
Added Value
Constraints
Implications



 
 Feedback:
Feedback on the lessons and experience presented, contributions and suggestions are welcome by email to:
livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk



" "DFID logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Panos Picture
  IDS Logo" "
" "
" "
Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search