Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search

 

Organisational Links and Events

reading photo
 

Livelihoods and Pro-poor Growth


"The progress which has been made over the last few decades in reducing the proportion of people living in poverty has been largely the result of economic
growth: raising incomes generally, including those of poor people… Economic growth is an indispensable requirement for poverty reduction".

However, as DFID's White Paper continues, economic growth by itself is not enough. Pro poor development requires growth and equity. Managed badly, economic growth can lead to further marginalisation and impoverishment.

The outcome largely depends on the policy choices adopted by governments, international institutions, the private sector and civil society.

This set of papers explores the links between the broader economic processes, the extent of pro-poor engagement and the micro reality.



The LADDER project takes a historical perspective to investigate how macro-economic reforms have affected livelihoods in southern Africa

Macroeconomic Policies and Rural Livelihood Diversification: An Ugandan Case-study (Arsene M. Balihuta / Kunal Sen/ LADDER Working Paper No.3 / 2001) (PDF)
Ladder, in this paper, explore economic reforms initiated in 1987 in Uganda - (judged to be) one of the most ambitious programs of economic liberalization in the African continent.
Economic Reforms and Rural Livelihood Diversification in Tanzania (Kunal Sen / LADDER Working Paper No.12 / 2002) (PDF)
This paper examines the impact of the economic reform programme initiated in Tanzania since 1986 on rural livelihoods. It looks particularly at the impact on scope for livelihood diversification.
Economic Reforms and Rural Livelihoods in Malawi (Kunal Sen / Archanjel Chinkunda / LADDER Working Paper No.20 /2002 ) (PDF)
This study examines whether the development reforms in Malawi in the 1980s have had the desired effect of providing a supportive environment for smallholder farmers to follow livelihood strategies that would enable them to move out of poverty.
Experience of Agricultural Market Liberalisation and Implications for Producers (Brian Cooksey / LADDER Working Paper No.16 / 2002) (PDF)
This paper offers a critical interpretation of the dominant policy of liberalisation of Tanzanian agriculture over the last decade and a half. It explores the liberalisation of export crops, staple crops and examines the role played by donor assistance to agriculture.

More Than Income: Pro-Poor Livestock Development Policy in Uganda (Steve Ashley / William Nanyeenya / LADDER Working Paper No.8 / 2002) (PDF)
This LADDER paper asks how livestock and the livestock sub-sector can best contribute to the overall goal of poverty reduction in Uganda. It argues that in focusing on production and livestock income, current policy approaches pay insufficient attention to the wider roles of livestock in contributing to rural livelihoods, and thereby miss opportunities to enhance its contribution to poverty reduction.


The Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa consider propoor growth in that region
The Rural Poor, the Private Sector and Markets: Changing Interactions in Southern Africa (SLSA Team / IDS/ 2003) (PDF)
This paper examines the strategies for development in southern Africa which have sought to boost access by the rural poor to new markets and investment opportunities.

The Livelihood Options project explores the role of government and the private sector with an underlying aim of pro-poor growth
Rural Non-farm Employment: an Analysis of Rural Urban Interdependencies (Amitabh Kundu / Niranjan Sarangi / Bal Paritosh Dash/ ODI/ Working Paper No.196/ 2003) (PDF)
This study in India examines the proposition that rural poverty has declined substantially during the later half of the 1990s, as suggested by data on consumption expenditure.

 
The 'Improving Policy-Livelihood Relations in South Asia' takes a broad look at pro-poor growth
Sustainable Livelihoods and their Linkages with Macro-Policies (Mohan Munasinghe) (PDF)
The major focus of this paper is to review to what extent growth-inducing macro-policies are linked to environmental or social harm, analyse the mechanisms underlying such interactions and draw appropriate policy conclusions focusing mainly on the developing world.

 
 Comments:
Send your insights, experiences and views on Livelihoods and
Pro-Poor Growth to the Post-it Board by email to:
livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk

Livelihoods and Pro-Poor Growth
Ladder Project
SL in Southern Africa Project
Livelihood Option Project
Improving Policy-Livelihood Relations Project
Comments



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

" "Livelihoods Network Logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Copyright Panos Pictures
  IDS logo" "
" "
www.livelihoods.org" "

Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search