Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search

 

Organisational Links and Events

reading photo
 

Decentralisation


Decentralisation is being talked about as one of the answers to pro-poor service delivery. It refers to "the transfer of political power, decision making capacity and resources from central to sub-national levels of government" (Walker, 2002). It can take many forms such as administrative decentralisation, fiscal decentralisation or devolution of decision-making powers or a complex mixture of different forms.

The potential benefits of decentralisation are:

  • Awareness of local priorities: local authorities are more likely to be sensitive and responsive to local circumstances and priorities

  • Information flow: local authorities can keep people informed given their closer proximity.

  • Revenue: local authorities can optimise revenue by drawing on local taxes, fees and user charges and feeding it directly back into the local area

  • Accountability: communities are in a better position to influence politics and policy at the local level and put pressure on local authorities.

However there are a number of concerns such as corruption, weak administrative systems and abuse of the system by local elites. In addition, local authorities may not be able or willing to increase local taxation. Furthermore, decentralisation does not necessarily mean that participation will be increased.

As the PRP projects show, the way in which decentralisation is undertaken and the impact that it has is heavily dependent on the context in which it takes place.




The IDS Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa (SLSA) explores the difficulties of introducing decentralised systems with the systems and structures already in place
Decentralisations in Practice in Southern Africa, SLSA Team (PDF)
This study reveals how decentralised service delivery can conflict with existing institutions and systems in case studies from Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
Rural Development, Institutional Change and Livelihoods in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Case Study of (Mdudwa Village / Zolile Ntshona / Edward Lahiff)
(PDF)
This paper examines the effect of decentralisation on a village in the Eastern Cape . It considers contests over land, forest and water resources and looks at the emerging power dynamics between new elected traditional authorities and raises questions about the efficacy and long-term sustainability of decentralisation reforms as currently conceived.


The ODI Livelihood Options project explores experience of decentralisation in India, in particular the Panchayat system, (local political bodies introduced in 1993)
Decentralisation in India: Poverty, Politics (Panchayati Raj / Craig Johnson) (PDF)
This literature review considers the extent to which administrative, political and fiscal authority has been devolved to the local panchayat system in India.
Decentralisation in Madhya Pradesh, India: from Panchayati Raj to Gram Swaraj, 1995 to 2001 (Amitabh Behar / Yogesh Kumar)
This paper looks at why the Panchayat system has not fulfilled expectations as a tool for local self-governance with disappointing achievements towards economic growth and social justice
Prelims to Ch 5 ( PDF) Ch 6-End (PDF)
Decentralising Natural Resource Management; Lessons from Local Government Reform in India (Pari Baumann / John Farrington) (PDF)
This paper explores decentralisation processes at State, district and village levels in Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka and specifically considers the influence of political economy factors on decentralised natural resource management in India.

The LADDER project investigates experience of decentralisation in three Sub-Saharan African countries, grounded in the reality of local livelihoods
Decentralisation and Rural Livelihoods in Malawi Sholto Cross and Milton Kutengule LADDER (Working Paper No.4 / September 2001) (PDF)
This paper describes how Malawi has established the legal framework for a comprehensive decentralisation but argues that while in principle decentralisation is desirable, the prerequisites for making this work are absent.
The Institutional Context of Rural Poverty Reduction in Uganda: Decentralisation's Dual Nature (Robert James /Paul Francis / Godfrey Ahabwe Pereza / LADDER Working Paper No.6/ November 2001) (PDF)
Uganda's decentralisation programme has been hailed by donors and academics alike as one of the most ambitious and far-reaching programmes of local government reform undertaken in the developing world. An actor-oriented approach elucidates the view from the periphery: from communities, administrators and locally elected politicians.
  Tanzanian Rural Livelihoods: Towards a More Enabling Institutional Environment (Robert James / Ntengua Mdoe / Fulgence Mishili / LADDER Working Paper No.13 / March 2002) (PDF)
This paper addresses several interlocking aspects of the institutional environment in which rural livelihoods are played out in Tanzania. Specifically it examines how the changing nature of local government may facilitate and inhibit rural livelihoods for example, through increased grassroot participation, better service delivery and 'blocking' institutional arrangements such as rural taxation.


The SEI's project 'Improving Policy-Livelihood Relations in South Asia' explores the micro-macro links which occur with decentralisation processes
Learning from the Grassroots: Lessons from Community Action for Policy Change (George Varughese / SEI ) (PDF)
This paper investigates how the decentralisation process in India is enabling more grassroots organisations to be recognised and how they are making an increasing contribution to policy formulation and implementation at different levels.

Khanya's project used Community Based Planning as a way to link decentralised institutions with citizens. In practice, it is argued, resources often get captured by 'meso-institutions' and do not reach the community level
Generic Community-Based Planning Manual (PDF)
The Community Based Planning Manual provides methodologies and tools showing how to link decentralised institutions with citizens. This drew on experience from projects in Uganda , South Africa, Ghana and Zimbabwe.
Making the Link Between Micro and Meso: Learning from Experience on Community Based Planning (PDF)
This paper summarises some ongoing work to develop and implement systems of community-based planning in Uganda, South Africa, Ghana and Zimbabwe.

The Sustainable Coastal Livelihoods (SCL) project explores the role of information to bridge the micro level with macro level policy processes
An Approach to Developing Informing and Influencing Strategies
Policy briefing paper (PDF) Working paper (PDF)
The Sustainable Coastal Livelihoods (SCL) research in India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka revealed that poor information flows between the policy-making level and the poor is a key obstacle in the generation of policies that effectively address poverty in coastal communities. This paper addresses the apparent lack of knowledge of the local context and discusses why existing information about the poor fails to influence policy and how information systems to inform policy might be improved.

Decentralisation
SL in Southern Africa Project
Livelihoods Options Project
Ladder Project
Improving Policy Livelihood Relations Project
Khanya Project
Sustainable Coastal Livelihoods
Comments



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 Comments:
Send your insights, experiences and views on decentralisation and the livelihoods of the Poor to the Post-it Board by email to:
livelihoods-connect@ids.ac.uk
 
 

" "Livelihoods Network Logo
" "Disclaimer
" "Photos Copyright Panos Pictures
  IDS logo" "
" "
www.livelihoods.org" "
Lessons Information Resources Email Update Enquiry Desk Post-it Board PIPs Home Search