Further details on CLTS in Cambodia
Challenges:
Ensuring
sustainability of latrines: Building latrines from locally
available, low-cost materials (broken jars, the base of palm tree
leaves etc.) means that many of these are temporary structures,
built without properly lined pits. The challenge lies in ensuring
technical assistance and access to durable sanitation hardware to
those communities willing to improve their structures, whilst maintaining
their initiative and ownership. Linking 100% open defecation free
(ODF) communities in remote rural areas with urban markets, suppliers
and vendors to give them access to a wide range of sanitary hardware,
will be a further challenge.
Latrine
design vs behaviour change: Concerns were raised regarding
the design of the simple low-cost pit latrines, used by most of
the families in the villages, as they are not water seal latrines
and thus do not meet MRD national standards. However, the priority
of CLTS is to trigger the behavioral changes required to stop open
defecation, using locally available low cost materials to construct
simple toilets. Once the age old practice of open defecation is
changed, the rest of the process flows easily and happens quickly:
people start to improve the toilet structure and design and hardly
anyone ever continues to use the simple and low-cost toilet constructed
at the onset of triggering CLTS.
Spread and Extension of CLTS: Spread and scaling
up of CLTS requires intensive expert facilitation. Thus, training
activities for community leaders, front line staff of government
departments, NGOs, INGOs and interested members of the Commune Councils
are needed. This training is not only useful for strengthening their
capacity in working with communities but also serves as a motivational
tool to reward them for the time and energy they volunteer.
Successes
• Initial success of Concern Cambodia’s CLTS programme
in Pursat, Kampung Cham and Siem Reap has drawn the attention of
many agencies including the MRD and UNICEF
• Early CLTS villages served as training and learning grounds
and a live demonstration of what could be accomplished by communities.
• Natural Leaders from these early CLTS villages visited other
villages and helped them to also attain ODF status.
Lessons
Learned/ Recommendations
• Communities are willing and able to build their own latrines
without any subsidy but this requires good facilitation and intensive
encouragement, for example inviting them to present their experiences
in workshops.
• PDRD (Provincial Rural Development Committee) staff are
capable and willing to serve as CLTS focal points if they are given
appropriate training. Additional training on how to communicate
effectively, how to facilitate community meetings and on health
education methodology would be useful.
• More community leaders and community consultants are required
for larger villages. Village chiefs and commune representatives
need to be provided with training on technical and facilitation
skills. This ensures that each community leader is assigned a role
that is within his/her capacity.
• National level workshops on CLTS need to be organized for
exposing interested agencies in Cambodia to community led processes.
The more people see CLTS in real life and interact with the communities
involved, the more they understand its dynamics.
• More motivational activities such as participatory hygiene
promotion, sanitation campaigns, involvement of children and religious
leaders need to be included.
Plans
• Plan and UNICEF are collaborating in the training of Provincial
Department of Rural Development (PDRD) staff (as well as Plan Cambodia
staff) in order to carry out CLTS in Kampung Cham and Siem Reap
provinces (Plan Cambodia target areas). UNICEF is supporting PDRD
to do the same in six other provinces. So far, about six pilots
are under way, and a first-stage scale-up of CLTS is now being planned
in UNICEF’s working areas.
(source:
Kamal Kar and Petra Bongartz, 2006. Update to IDS Working Paper
257 PDF) |